On June 27, 2024, the United States Supreme Court (the “Court”) affirmed the Fifth Circuit’s ruling in SEC v. Jarkesy and held that a defendant facing civil penalties in a securities fraud claim brought by the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) has a right to a jury trial in a federal court.1 Specifically, the Court held that the SEC’s attempt to compel respondents to defend themselves before the agency, namely in an administrative proceeding before an Administrative Law Judge (“ALJ”) employed by the SEC, violates respondents’ Seventh Amendment right to a jury trial in cases where the SEC pursues civil penalties. Accordingly, this decision will likely limit the number of future SEC actions adjudicated by an ALJ in an administrative forum due to the restriction on the available remedies.Continue Reading SEC v. Jarkesy: A Divided Supreme Court Holds That the SEC Cannot Seek Civil Penalties through an Administrative Proceeding
Administrative process
Supreme Court Paves the Way for Constitutional Challenges in Federal District Courts to FTC and SEC Administrative Proceedings
By Matthew Rossi & Eleanor Hudson Callaway on
Posted in Administrative Process, Securities Law
By: Matthew A. Rossi and Eleanor Hudson Callaway
On Friday, April 14, 2023, the Supreme Court cleared the way for respondents in Federal Trade Commission (“FTC”) and Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) administrative proceedings to challenge the constitutionality of those proceedings in federal district court while the administrative process is ongoing. Typically, as required by…